Awards
> Keith Awards for 2000
|
Society of Rural Physicians of Canada |
|
|
Société de la médecine rurale du Canada |
The Society of Rural Physicians of Canada is pleased to award family practice programs top honours for doing the most in helping train doctors for the 31%1 of Canadians who live in predominantly rural regions. This Award has been given out yearly since the year 2000 with slightly different rules and methodology each time. The commissioning and fabrication of the Keith Trophy occurred during the following years
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Top Rural Medical School Programs in Canada in 2010 The Society of Rural Physicians of Canada is pleased to award Memorial University Of Newfoundland family practice program top honours for doing the most in helping train rural doctors. The Keith Award was presented at the annual Rural and Remote conference in Toronto ON in April 2010. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Top Rural Medical School Programs in Canada in 2009 The Society of Rural Physicians of Canada is pleased to award Queen's University family practice program top honours for doing the most in helping train rural doctors. The Keith Award was presented at the annual Rural and Remote conference in Halifax NS in April 2009. Queen's University
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Top Rural Medical School Programs in Canada in 2008 Dalhousie University
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Keith award was not presented to any university in 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Top Rural Medical School Programs in Canada in 2006 University or British Columbia
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Top Rural Medical School Programs in Canada in 2005
MethodologyFor this year's award we did use the database that the SRPC gets on physicians and looked at the alma mater of all rural docs in 1998 and again in 2004. While overall rural doctor numbers are down, the winning undergraduate programs have "held the line" on numbers of their grads that were going into rural communities. Reference
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Top 4 Rural Family Practice Programs in Canada in 2004
MethodologyFor this year's award the total number of residents graduating 1989 to 1999 year period that went rural (for this study practice address in a town under 10,000 pop at 1996 census) 2 years post graduation were identified. Family medicine residents were identified through the Canadian Post MD
Educational Registry. Practice location was taken from the Canadian Medical Association database two years
after graduation. 34% of Université Laval family physicians graduates went rural in the study period
which was 16.4% of all rural doctors produced by Canadian programs.
1. In 1996, 31.4 percent of Canada’s population lived in predominantly rural regions. http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/010116/b010116a.htm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Top 4 Rural Family Practice Programs in Canada in 2003
This year we award the Keith Trophy to the overall winner, Family Medicine North. They also won in 2001
MethodologyFor this year, the winners were determined by the results of performance in actually having graduates practicing in rural areas, the amount of rural content in the program, and the percentage of R3 programs where more than 10% of graduates practiced in rural areas (eg FP-anesthesia, FP-Surgery, advanced maternity care etc). Family medicine residents were identified through the Canadian Post MD
Educational Registry. Practice location was taken from the Canadian Medical Association database two years
after graduation.
1. In 1996, 31.4 percent of Canada’s population lived in predominantly rural regions. http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/010116/b010116a.htm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Top 4 Rural Family Practice Programs in Canada in 2002
This year we award the Keith Trophy to the overall winner, Memorial University (see the news release). They also won the Inaugural Keith Awards in 2000. Family medicine North won in 2001 MethodologyFor this year, the tenth anniversary of the Society of Rural Physicians, the winners were determined by the results of performance in actually having graduates practicing in rural areas at 10 years after graduation, Family medicine residents were identified through the Canadian Post MD
Educational Registry for 1989 to 1991. Practice location was taken from the Canadian Medical Association
database ten years later.
1. In 1996, 31.4 percent of Canada’s population lived in predominantly rural regions. http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/010116/b010116a.htm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Top 4 Rural Family Practice Programs in Canada in 2001
This year we award the Keith Trophy to the overall winner, Family Medicine North (McMaster's Program based in Thunder Bay). This program was second in reputation and first in percentage of rural graduates. The SRPC news release is at http://www.srpc.ca/media/ ![]() MethodologyThe winners were determined by combining the results of performance in actually having graduates practicing in rural areas at two years after graduation, and the second, by reputation for quality rural training as determined by survey. Actually having physicians go practice in rural placements after their training was weighted at 60% of the final score. Assessment of quality of training was weighted at 40%. Family medicine residents were identified through the Canadian Post MD
Educational Registry for 1997 and 1998. Practice location was taken from the 2000 Canadian Medical Association
database. Rural was defined as communities under 10,000 population at 1996 census by Statistics Canada.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Top 5 Rural Family Practice Programs in Canada in 2000The Society of Rural Physicians of Canada is pleased to award 5 family practice programs top honours for doing the most in helping train doctors for the 31% of Canadians who are rural. Here are the winners for the year 2000:
The overall winner, Memorial was the first place winner in the quality score and was second place in its performance in having graduates of the program practicing in rural areas at two years out. MethodologyThe winners were determined by combining the results of performance
in actually having graduates practicing in rural areas at two years after graduation, and the second, by reputation
for quality rural training as determined in a survey. Actually having physicians go practice in rural placements
after their training was weighted at 70% of the final score.
Assessment of quality of training was weighted at 30% and was determined by a poll of practicing rural physicians on April 4th at the 8th Rural and Remote conference in Ottawa. The distribution of registrants at the conference was representative of the regions. Rural components of each university's Department of Family Medicine were included where applicable in the following results.
Note: All Family Practice programs of the University, included those designated "Rural" programs have been included in the scores so as to fairly compare university departments of Family Medicine.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||